SubScribe : Post   Email   Feed

Posts Tagged ‘change’

You’re Ready For A Career Change

Thursday, December 9th, 2010

You finally did it. You made the decision to leave a career that makes you dread every Monday morning and pursue one that you feel is your true calling. Congratulations! Making the decision was the hard part, right? Unfortunately, no. You’ve convinced yourself that this is the right move…how do you convince everyone else? It’s time to work on your resume.

Resume writing for this situation can be challenging, to say the least. Why? Think about it for a moment – how do you go from a retail manager to a purchasing agent in a corporate environment? Or from an accountant to a salesperson? Not all career changes are that drastic, but you get the picture. Once you look at it from this point of view though, it makes you wonder how in the world you’ll get a job in a new field.

There are a number of things your resume has to portray to the reader:

• The skills that you learned and honed in your past jobs transfer to the one you are applying for.

• Your strengths and accomplishments compliment the field and position (or type) of position you are seeking.

• You can do something other than what you are currently doing.

So how exactly do you do this? How do you convince a potential employer that you have what it takes to meet and exceed the expectations for the job – no matter what previous jobs you’ve held in the past? One way is by writing a functional resume.

A functional resume is one that you don’t see nearly as often as the tradition chronological and combination ones. That’s because they are used when the situation for the job seeker is not ideal. Other instances may be returning to the workforce after a long period of time or job hopping. A functional resume is used when it wouldn’t be as effective as if you had a solid work history, no gaps in employment and are looking for a job similar to the one you are currently in, if not a step-up.

Your resume may start out with an executive profile or summary of what you have done in the past and what you are looking to do in the future. This is the time to really “talk yourself up”. You do not want to modest.

An example might be:
Accomplished and experienced professional with a 10-year proven record of developing accurate sales plans based on intensive analysis and communication with integral departments. Combines astute strategic and business skills with an impeccable work ethic and drive for success. Self-starter that is enthusiastic, forward-thinking and recognized as a peak performer.

How do you begin to write the body of your resume? Take all your achievements, strengths, education and/or training and write them down. Which ones can you group together under one heading? Headings could include:

• Leadership
• Financial Management
• Account Management
• Goal Setting & Achievement

Of course, these headings are just examples to get your own wheels turning. They will differ depending on your own experience and achievements.

As you are compiling your lists, keep in mind that you are writing for you new career, not your present or past ones. Present this valuable information in a compelling manner that shows how you can be a benefit to a company in your desired career. Use strong adjectives, verbs and keywords to really get your point across.

Now that you have the difficult part done, the next steps are easy. Include your work history, education and any other special training and/or skills that you deem important at the end of your resume. Even though the focus is on the main body of your resume, the other information needs to be on there for reference sake.

And that’s it! You’re done writing your resume. Hard work – yes, but well worth it when you consider what you are now able to tackle – a new job, a new career…a new life!

Are you guilty of sabotaging your own job search along with the opportunity to earn more money? Don’t underestimate the value of your resume. Heather Eagar, owner of http://www.ResumeLines.com, provides unbiased reviews of resume services on the net. ==> Sign-up for your free Job Search Email-Course at http://www.resumelines.com/ecourse.html

Climate Change Vs Global Warming – What is the Difference?

Thursday, August 19th, 2010

Climate Change Vs Global Warming – What is the Difference?

Climate change is impacting our earth in ways you couldn’t imagine. So is climate change harming the environment or is it global warming we need to worry about? Are they the same thing?

Pollution by cars is a major issue for most of modern-day societies. The pollution in air is comprised of many environmental attributes. It contains carbon monoxide, nitrates, sulfur dioxide, ozone, lead, secondhand tobacco smoke and particulate matter. Particulate matter, also known as particle pollution, is comprised of liquid and solid particles in the air. It is produced from road dust, tire fragmentation, vehicle emissions, power generation and industrial combustion, smelting and other metal processing, construction and demolition activities, residential wood burning, windblown soil, pollens, molds, forest fires, volcanic emissions and sea spray. These particles vary significantly in size, composition and origin.

Overloaded and busy streets of the USA contribute much to the deterioration of the air pollution issue. Carbon monoxide is a biggest constituent of air pollution. It is highly toxic, odorless and colorless gas. It is connected with incineration reaction in cars and other vehicles same with cigarette smoke. Carbon monoxide is dangerous due to the fact that when our body consumes it, the level of oxygen diminishes. Higher ranges of carbon monoxide is a danger to one’s life. Minimal levels of CO if inhaled by the body in a long extent of time will still cause respiratory sickness. Too much exposure may lead to harmful health issues.

When you go out on streets, you see large trucks blowing out too much murky smoke. Analysis depict that there is a very huge negative impact caused by pollution from cars and other air pollutants.

A study clarifies that a personís exposure to toxic constituents of air pollution may differ as much within one city as across different cities. After surveying 5000 human beings for eight years, the analysts also observed that exposure to traffic-allied air pollutants was extremely linked to mortality than were city-wide background levels. For instance, those who lived near a busy road were more probable to die of a cardiovascular event.

Some examinations had approximated that citizens living in the most polluted US cities could drop 1.8 to 3.1 years because of exposure to constant air pollution. This has showed the way to conclude that:

Temporary exposure to increased ranges of particle pollution is linked with a greater danger of death due to a cardiovascular event.

Hospital admittance for various cardiovascular and pulmonary issues heightens in reply to greater concentration of particle pollution. Extended exposure to higher levels of particle pollution is a factor in dropping total life expectancy by a few years. These facts are really indicating us what future awaits Americans if this scenario carries on. Indeed, a demand to normalize pollution by cars is needed not only for the well-being of the present time<img src="http://www.articlesfactory.com/pic/x.gif" alt="Free Web Content" border="0", but for the times ahead.

Learn how you can help save the environment at www.SimplyGreenLife.com

Article Tags:
Carbon Monoxide, Particle Pollution

Shaye Michaels is the creator of http://www.SimplyGreenLife.com, a blog dedicated to teaching others how to live life green. It’s not as hard as you may think. Check out our free tips on how to live a simple green life.

Comparing and contrasting structural change in the U.S., the European Union and Asia

Tuesday, June 8th, 2010

The global economy has done much to change how financial institutions work in what is termed an expanding circle of systemically important countries (SIC). It has been observed with some interest that the emerging-market countries are bringing about significant changes in how the developed countries are doing business, and how it is affecting the balance of economic power. A controversy has emerged in which there is a perceived impending shift away from the US, while others believe the US will retain economic superpower status.

The eleven emerging markets considered SIC at this time are China, Argentina, India, Mexico, Russia, Turkey, Indonesia, Korea, Saudi Arabia, South Africa, and Brazil. However, this list is far from complete and final, and may actually be made up of as many as 30 countries, depending on the economic issue. Some countries, which may in themselves not be SIC but membership in the European Union, for example, gives them more influence in the global economy.

Because of this influence, there has been a recent need to monitor governance in SIC lest mismanaged economic power adversely affect the rest of the global economy. Economic policy makers for these and similar countries typically make decisions with the country’s interest in mind. In a global economy, policy makers in SIC as well as developed countries must also consider how such policies affect other countries and seek to coordinate their activities and plans accordingly based on a common point of reference or framework for each issue that crop up.

To illustrate, the imbalance between countries that have and countries that have not has put a strain on the global economy because it affects the exchange rate and the flow of goods. One example is rate of imports by the US, which considered unsustainable. Such activity also tends to encourage overproduction, which in the event of a sudden fall of demand for these products could spell considerable ruin for the producing country. It is therefore no longer a question of simple market forces because it deals with more than a single economy.

The growth of international reserves is also of concern. In the case of Asia, especially Japan, the doubling of the foreign exchange reserves in the continent may have addressed the problem of short-term external debts, but may have adversely affected the currency reserves of other areas in the global economy. Because everything is connected, such an economic policy has to be considered from a broader context than merely continent wide.

One other consideration is the increased representation and participation of SIC and developed countries in any policymaking would go a long way to promoting stability and growth. One such venue for participation is the International Monetary Fund (IMF) executive board and in the voting shares. Such a restructuring would ensure that the IMF retains its legitimacy as a globally centered agency for policymaking. Aside from providing a platform for SIC which have little or no influence in global positions, it is suggested that countries in the European Union, as a collective group, should be reduced to one seat to solidify its base as a single organization.

These are just two generalized ideas of how the global economy has affected the US, countries of the European Union and Asia. It does illustrate, however, that while the economic power is still in the hands of developed countries, the potential for good and harm from the SICs are considerable, and must be addressed to ensure that the global economic structure does not unravel at the seams.

Robin Trehan is an M&A Expert. He can be reached at robin@tafunds.com